↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of miniaturization and the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris, comprising the world's smallest vertebrate

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of miniaturization and the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris, comprising the world's smallest vertebrate
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Rüber, Maurice Kottelat, Heok Hui Tan, Peter KL Ng, Ralf Britz

Abstract

Paedocypris, a highly developmentally truncated fish from peat swamp forests in Southeast Asia, comprises the world's smallest vertebrate. Although clearly a cyprinid fish, a hypothesis about its phylogenetic position among the subfamilies of this largest teleost family, with over 2400 species, does not exist. Here we present a phylogenetic analyses of 227 cypriniform taxa, including 213 cyprinids, based upon complete mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b nucleotide sequences in order to determine the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris and to study the evolution of miniaturization among cyprinids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 157 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Professor 11 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 29 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,509,495
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#357
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,091
of 89,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.