↓ Skip to main content

Procalcitonin reflects bacteremia and bacterial load in urosepsis syndrome: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Procalcitonin reflects bacteremia and bacterial load in urosepsis syndrome: a prospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cees van Nieuwkoop, Tobias N Bonten, Jan W van't Wout, Ed J Kuijper, Geert H Groeneveld, Martin J Becker, Ted Koster, G Hanke Wattel-Louis, Nathalie M Delfos, Hans C Ablij, Eliane MS Leyten, Jaap T van Dissel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 18 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,511,106
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,535
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,774
of 189,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.