↓ Skip to main content

A shared framework for the common mental disorders and Non-Communicable Disease: key considerations for disease prevention and control

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A shared framework for the common mental disorders and Non-Communicable Disease: key considerations for disease prevention and control
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0394-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrienne O’Neil, Felice N Jacka, Shae E Quirk, Fiona Cocker, C Barr Taylor, Brian Oldenburg, Michael Berk

Abstract

BackgroundHistorically, the focus of Non Communicable Disease (NCD) prevention and control has been cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cancer and chronic respiratory diseases. Collectively, these account for more deaths than any other NCDs. Despite recent calls to include the common mental disorders (CMDs) of depression and anxiety under the NCD umbrella, prevention and control of these CMDs remain largely separate and independent.DiscussionIn order to address this gap, we apply a framework recently proposed by the Centers for Disease Control with three overarching objectives: (1) to obtain better scientific information through surveillance, epidemiology, and prevention research; (2) to disseminate this information to appropriate audiences through communication and education; and (3) to translate this information into action through programs, policies, and systems. We conclude that a shared framework of this type is warranted, but also identify opportunities within each objective to advance this agenda and consider the potential benefits of this approach that may exist beyond the health care system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 25%
Psychology 30 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 53 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,413,090
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,785
of 4,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,986
of 352,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#26
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.