↓ Skip to main content

Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel plus maintenance bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer combined with…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel plus maintenance bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer combined with exploratory analysis of circulating endothelial cells: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG)1016
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4150-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Ikeda, Terufumi Kato, Takashi Ogura, Akimasa Sekine, Tsuneyuki Oda, Noriyuki Masuda, Satoshi Igawa, Ken Katono, Sakiko Otani, Kouzo Yamada, Haruhiro Saito, Tetsuro Kondo, Yukio Hosomi, Yoshiro Nakahara, Masanori Nishikawa, Keiko Utumi, Yuki Misumi, Takeharu Yamanaka, Kentaro Sakamaki, Hiroaki Okamoto

Abstract

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that docetaxel and bevacizumab may act synergistically by decreasing endothelial cell proliferation and preventing circulating endothelial progenitor mobilization. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naive and had advanced/recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. The patients received 4 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m2), cisplatin (80 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance therapy, every 3 weeks until disease progression or attainment of unacceptable toxicity level. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The numbers of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) were also estimated on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle for the exploratory analysis of efficacy prediction. A total of 47 patients were enrolled from October 2010 to April 2012. Bevacizumab as maintenance therapy was administered to 41 patients (87.2%), and the median number of total treatment cycles was 9 (range: 1-36). ORR, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival of the patients were 74.5%, 9.0 months, and 27.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (95.7%), followed by leukopenia (59.6%) and hypertension (46.8%). PFS was longer in patients with ≥10 count increase in CECs than that in patients with < 10 count increase in CECs (respective median PFS of 11.0 months versus 6.90 months) although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). A combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance was highly effective in patients with non-squamous NSCLC despite the high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The increase in CEC count between days 1 and 8 may predict the efficacy of our bevacizumab-contained treatment regimen. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004368 . Registered date; October 11, 2010 (Retrospectively registered).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,155
of 8,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,872
of 331,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#110
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.