↓ Skip to main content

The Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (DOiT) cluster controlled implementation trial: intervention effects and mediators and moderators of adiposity and energy balance-related behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (DOiT) cluster controlled implementation trial: intervention effects and mediators and moderators of adiposity and energy balance-related behaviours
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12966-014-0158-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke van Nassau, Amika S Singh, Ester Cerin, Jo Salmon, Willem van Mechelen, Johannes Brug, Mai JM Chinapaw

Abstract

BackgroundThe school-based Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (DOiT) programme is an evidence-based obesity prevention programme tailored to adolescents attending the first two years of prevocational education in the Netherlands. The initial programme showed promising results during an effectiveness trial. The programme was then adapted and prepared for nationwide dissemination. To gain more insight into the process of translating evidence-based approaches into `real world¿ (i.e., `natural¿) conditions, our research aims were to evaluate the impact of the DOiT-implementation programme on adolescents¿ adiposity and energy balance-related behaviours during natural dissemination and to explore the mediating and moderating factors underlying the DOiT intervention effects.MethodsWe conducted a cluster-controlled implementation trial with 20 voluntary intervention schools (n¿=¿1002 adolescents), who adopted the programme, and 9 comparable control schools (n¿=¿484 adolescents). We measured adolescents¿ body height and weight, skinfold thicknesses (i.e., triceps, biceps, suprailiac and subscapular), and waist circumference. We assessed adolescents¿ dietary and physical activity behaviours by means of self-report. Data were collected at baseline and at 20-months follow-up. We used multivariable multilevel linear or logistic regression analyses to evaluate the intervention effects and to test the hypothesised behavioural mediating factors. We checked for potential effect modification by gender, ethnicity and education level.ResultsWe found no significant intervention effects on any of the measures of adiposity (BMI, waist circumference or skinfolds) or behavioural outcomes. Furthermore, we found no mediating effects by any of the hypothesised behavioural mediators. Stratified analyses for gender showed that the intervention was effective in reducing sugar-containing beverage consumption in girls (B¿=¿¿188.2 ml/day; 95%CI¿=¿¿344.0;-32.3). In boys, we found a significant positive intervention effect on breakfast frequency (B¿=¿0.29 days/week; 95%CI¿=¿0.01; 0.58). Stratified analyses for education level showed an adverse intervention effect (B¿=¿0.09; 95%CI¿=¿0.02; 0.16) on BMI z-scores for adolescents attending the vocational education track.ConclusionsAlthough not successful in changing adolescents¿ adiposity, the DOiT-implementation programme had some beneficial effects on specific obesity-related behaviours in subgroups. This study underlines the difficulty of translating intervention effectiveness in controlled settings to real world contexts. Adaptations to the implementation strategy are needed in order to promote implementation as intended by the teachers.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN92755979.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Sports and Recreations 18 8%
Psychology 18 8%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#12,914,251
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,641
of 1,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,346
of 353,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#37
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.