↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations
Published in
Trials, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2526-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Sawtell, Lorna Sweeney, Meg Wiggins, Cathryn Salisbury, Sandra Eldridge, Lauren Greenberg, Rachael Hunter, Inderjeet Kaur, Christine McCourt, Bethan Hatherall, Gail Findlay, Joanne Morris, Sandra Reading, Adrian Renton, Ruth Adekoya, Belinda Green, Belinda Harvey, Sarah Latham, Kanta Patel, Logan Vanlessen, Angela Harden

Abstract

The provision of high-quality maternity services is a priority for reducing inequalities in health outcomes for mothers and infants. Best practice includes women having their initial antenatal appointment within the first trimester of pregnancy in order to provide screening and support for healthy lifestyles, well-being and self-care in pregnancy. Previous research has identified inequalities in access to antenatal care, yet there is little evidence on interventions to improve early initiation of antenatal care. The Community REACH trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of engaging communities in the co-production and delivery of an intervention that addresses this issue. The study design is a matched cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations. The unit of randomisation is electoral ward. The intervention will be delivered in 10 wards; 10 comparator wards will have normal practice. The primary outcome is the proportion of pregnant women attending their antenatal booking appointment by the 12th completed week of pregnancy. This and a number of secondary outcomes will be assessed for cohorts of women (n = approximately 1450 per arm) who give birth 2-7 and 8-13 months after intervention delivery completion in the included wards, using routinely collected maternity data. Eight hospitals commissioned to provide maternity services in six NHS trusts in north and east London and Essex have been recruited to the study. These trusts will provide anonymised routine data for randomisation and outcomes analysis. The process evaluation will examine intervention implementation, acceptability, reach and possible causal pathways. The economic evaluation will use a cost-consequences analysis and decision model to evaluate the intervention. Targeted community engagement in the research process was a priority. Community REACH aims to increase early initiation of antenatal care using an intervention that is co-produced and delivered by local communities. This pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, with integrated process and economic evaluation, aims to rigorously assess the effectiveness of this public health intervention, which is particularly complex due to the required combination of standardisation with local flexibility. It will also answer questions about scalability and generalisability. ISRCTN registry: registration number 63066975 . Registered on 18 August 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 51 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 64 41%