↓ Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment: study protocol for a…

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study
Published by
Springer Nature, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1891-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Glinatsi, Marte S. Heiberg, Anna Rudin, Dan Nordström, Espen A. Haavardsholm, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Mikkel Østergaard, Till Uhlig, Gerdur Grondal, Kim Hørslev-Petersen, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Merete L. Hetland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 28 30%