You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study
|
---|---|
Published by |
Springer Nature, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13063-017-1891-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel Glinatsi, Marte S. Heiberg, Anna Rudin, Dan Nordström, Espen A. Haavardsholm, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Mikkel Østergaard, Till Uhlig, Gerdur Grondal, Kim Hørslev-Petersen, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Merete L. Hetland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 39% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 30% |