↓ Skip to main content

Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Surgery, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther V. A. Bouwsma, Johannes R. Anema, A. Vonk Noordegraaf, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Judith A. F. Huirne

Abstract

Convalescence advice is often based on tradition and anecdote from health care providers, rather than being based on experiences from patients themselves. The aim of this study was to analyse recovery in terms of resumption of various daily activities including work, following different laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in order to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations. This is a prospective cohort study conducted in nine general and one university hospital in the Netherlands. Women aged 18-65 years and scheduled for a hysterectomy (laparoscopic, vaginal, abdominal) and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery (n = 304) were eligible to participate. Preoperatively, participants were provided with tailored expert-based convalescence recommendations on the graded resumption of several daily activities including sitting, standing, walking, climbing stairs, bending, lifting, driving, cycling, household chores, sport activities and return to work (RTW). Postoperatively, time until the resumption of these activities was tracked. Convalescence recommendations were considered correct when at least 25% and less than 50% of the women were able to resume an activity before or at the recommended recovery time. There was a wide variation in the duration until the resumption of daily activities within and between groups of patients undergoing different types of surgery. Recovery times lengthened with increasing levels of physical burden as well as with increasing levels of invasiveness of the surgery. For the majority of activities actual recovery times exceeded the recovery time recommended by the expert panel. This study provided insight in the resumption of daily activities after gynecological surgery and the adequacy of an expert-based convalescence guideline in clinical practice. Patient data was used to optimize the convalescence recommendations. Dutch trial registry, NTR2087 (August 2009) and NTR2933 (June 2011).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Computer Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 35%