↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of 3-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (3D-VATS) for pulmonary resection

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of 3-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (3D-VATS) for pulmonary resection
Published in
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13022-015-0018-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Dickhoff, Wilson W. Li, Petr Symersky, Koen J. Hartemink

Abstract

Two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery (2D-VATS) has gained its position in daily practise. Although very useful, its two-dimensional view has its drawbacks when performing pulmonary resections. We report our first experience with 3-dimensional video-assisted surgery (3D-VATS). Advantages and differences with 2D-VATS and robotic surgery (RS) are discussed. To evaluate feasibility, we scheduled patients for surgery by 3D-VATS who would normally be treated with 2D-VATS. The main difference of the equipment in 3D-VATS compared with former VATS equipment, is the flexible camera-tip (100-degrees) and the necessary 3D-glasses. Four patients were successfully operated for anatomic pulmonary resections. On-the-structure dissection was easily performed and with the flexible camera-tip, a perfect view can be obtained, with clear visualisation of important (hilar) structures. These features highly facilitate the surgeon in tissue preparation and recognition of the dissection planes. In our opinion, 3D-VATS is superior to 2D-VATS for performing anatomic pulmonary resection and we expect an improvement in terms of operation time and learning curve. Furthermore, it is a valuable alternative for RS at lower costs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 33%
Other 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 89%
Psychology 1 11%