↓ Skip to main content

Functional health state description and valuation by people aged 65 and over: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional health state description and valuation by people aged 65 and over: a pilot study
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12877-018-0711-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riaan Botes, Karin M. Vermeulen, Adelita V. Ranchor, Erik Buskens

Abstract

Assessing quality of life among the elderly is a complex and multifaceted issue. Elderly people might find valuing and describing their personal experience of quality of life (QoL) demanding and cumbersome. This study therefore sought to determine the feasibility of administering two questionnaires in two samples of elderly people. A preference-based instrument (EQ-5D + C) and a currently achieved functioning questionnaire (CAF) were utilized. Two pilot studies were performed. The first was performed in South Africa (n = 30), designed to test whether elderly respondents could complete and understand the two questionnaires and also to indicate which valuation method, visual analogue scale or time trade off they preferred. A second pilot study was performed in the Netherlands (n = 30), designed to investigate the use of both questionnaires in determining quality of life and health state valuations in a Dutch sample of elderly. Seventy percent of the South African respondents indicated that they preferred the visual analogue scale (VAS) method, when compared to the time trade-off (TTO). In both the South African and the Dutch pilot studies, the respondents, with different dependency levels, were able to use both questionnaires to determine health state descriptions and valuations. When ranking the profiles from fewer to more problems, the EQ-5D + C exhibits a gradual downwards trend, with a maximum of 100 and minimum VAS value of 41. The CAF also exhibits a gradual downwards trend, with a maximum of 1.00 and minimum VAS value of 36. The results indicate that individuals from different parts of the world are able to complete, describe, and value the questionnaires. It is our recommendation that a comprehensive study should be done, which includes both the EQ-5D + C questionnaire and the CAF questionnaire, since the two questionnaires have proven to be feasible in providing information on quality of life and well-being of elderly people.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%