↓ Skip to main content

Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amna Klich, Catherine Mercier, Laurent Gerfault, Pierre Grangeat, Corinne Beaulieu, Elodie Degout-Charmette, Tanguy Fortin, Pierre Mahé, Jean-François Giovannelli, Jean-Philippe Charrier, Audrey Giremus, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Pascal Roy

Abstract

In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variability. However, in case of unbalanced data (unequal number of observations in all factor combinations), the classical methods cannot correctly estimate the various sources of variability, particularly in presence of interaction. The present paper proposes an extension of the variance component analysis to estimate the various components of the variance, including an interaction component in case of unbalanced data. We applied an experimental design that uses a serial dilution to generate known relative protein concentrations and estimated these concentrations by two processing algorithms, a classical and a more recent one. The extended method allowed estimating the variances explained by the dilution and the technical process by each algorithm in an experiment with 9 proteins: L-FABP, 14.3.3 sigma, Calgi, Def.A6, Villin, Calmo, I-FABP, Peroxi-5, and S100A14. Whereas, the recent algorithm gave a higher dilution variance and a lower technical variance than the classical one in two proteins with three peptides (L-FABP and Villin), there were no significant difference between the two algorithms on all proteins. The extension of the variance component analysis was able to estimate correctly the variance components of protein concentration measurement in case of unbalanced design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Mathematics 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,468,008
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,891
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,811
of 331,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#96
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.