↓ Skip to main content

Computational simulations of interactions of the κ-hefutoxin1 with the voltage-gated potassium ion channels

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational simulations of interactions of the κ-hefutoxin1 with the voltage-gated potassium ion channels
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-1-s1-p36
Authors

M Zarrabi, H Naderi-Manesh

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2009.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#314
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,283
of 72,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them