↓ Skip to main content

Fast and efficient short read mapping based on a succinct hash index

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast and efficient short read mapping based on a succinct hash index
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2094-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haowen Zhang, Yuandong Chan, Kaichao Fan, Bertil Schmidt, Weiguo Liu

Abstract

Various indexing techniques have been applied by next generation sequencing read mapping tools. The choice of a particular data structure is a trade-off between memory consumption, mapping throughput, and construction time. We present the succinct hash index - a novel data structure for read mapping which is a variant of the classical q-gram index with a particularly small memory footprint occupying between 3.5 and 5.3 GB for a human reference genome for typical parameter settings. The succinct hash index features two novel seed selection algorithms (group seeding and variable-length seeding) and an efficient parallel construction algorithm, which we have implemented to design the FEM (Fast(F) and Efficient(E) read Mapper(M)) mapper. FEM can return all read mappings within a given edit distance. Our experimental results show that FEM is scalable and outperforms other state-of-the-art all-mappers in terms of both speed and memory footprint. Compared to Masai, FEM is an order-of-magnitude faster using a single thread and two orders-of-magnitude faster when using multiple threads. Furthermore, we observe an up to 2.8-fold speedup compared to BitMapper and an order-of-magnitude speedup compared to BitMapper2 and Hobbes3. The presented succinct index is the first feasible implementation of the q-gram index functionality that occupies around 3.5 GB of memory for a whole human reference genome. FEM is freely available at https://github.com/haowenz/FEM .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Engineering 4 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,900,658
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,306
of 7,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,347
of 333,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#59
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.