You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emir Yuzbasioglu, Hanefi Kurt, Rana Turunc, Halenur Bilir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 607 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 56 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 14% |
| Unknown | 211 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 323 | 53% |
| Engineering | 14 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 4% |
| Unknown | 229 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,683,614
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#120
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,792
of 310,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.