You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Window screening, ceilings and closed eaves as sustainable ways to control malaria in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-8-221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila B Ogoma, Khadija Kannady, Maggy Sikulu, Prosper P Chaki, Nicodem J Govella, Wolfgang R Mukabana, Gerry F Killeen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,225,813
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,068
of 5,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,360
of 94,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.