↓ Skip to main content

Clouded leopards, the secretive top-carnivore of South-East Asian rainforests: their distribution, status and conservation needs in Sabah, Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clouded leopards, the secretive top-carnivore of South-East Asian rainforests: their distribution, status and conservation needs in Sabah, Malaysia
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-6-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Wilting, Frauke Fischer, Soffian Abu Bakar, K Eduard Linsenmair

Abstract

The continued depletion of tropical rainforests and fragmentation of natural habitats has led to significant ecological changes which place most top carnivores under heavy pressure. Various methods have been used to determine the status of top carnivore populations in rainforest habitats, most of which are costly in terms of equipment and time. In this study we utilized, for the first time, a rigorous track classification method to estimate population size and density of clouded leopards (Neofelis nebulosa) in Tabin Wildlife Reserve in north-eastern Borneo (Sabah). Additionally, we extrapolated our local-scale results to the regional landscape level to estimate clouded leopard population size and density in all of Sabah's reserves, taking into account the reserves' conservation status (totally protected or commercial forest reserves), their size and presence or absence of clouded leopards.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 283 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 25%
Student > Master 56 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Other 18 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 60%
Environmental Science 62 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 37 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,221,439
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#842
of 3,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,922
of 89,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.