You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clouded leopards, the secretive top-carnivore of South-East Asian rainforests: their distribution, status and conservation needs in Sabah, Malaysia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-6-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Wilting, Frauke Fischer, Soffian Abu Bakar, K Eduard Linsenmair |
| Abstract |
The continued depletion of tropical rainforests and fragmentation of natural habitats has led to significant ecological changes which place most top carnivores under heavy pressure. Various methods have been used to determine the status of top carnivore populations in rainforest habitats, most of which are costly in terms of equipment and time. In this study we utilized, for the first time, a rigorous track classification method to estimate population size and density of clouded leopards (Neofelis nebulosa) in Tabin Wildlife Reserve in north-eastern Borneo (Sabah). Additionally, we extrapolated our local-scale results to the regional landscape level to estimate clouded leopard population size and density in all of Sabah's reserves, taking into account the reserves' conservation status (totally protected or commercial forest reserves), their size and presence or absence of clouded leopards. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 282 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 78 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 187 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,575,100
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#665
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,669
of 88,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.