↓ Skip to main content

A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised dose-ranging study of tiotropium Respimat® in children with symptomatic asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids
Published in
Respiratory Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12931-015-0175-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Vogelberg, Petra Moroni-Zentgraf, Migle Leonaviciute-Klimantaviciene, Ralf Sigmund, Eckard Hamelmann, Michael Engel, Stanley Szefler

Abstract

A considerable number of children with asthma remain symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, resulting in significant morbidity, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare costs and lost school days. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg and 1.25 μg add-on to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a leukotriene modifier, in children aged 6-11 years with symptomatic asthma.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,726,658
of 19,208,681 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#162
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,714
of 306,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,208,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them