↓ Skip to main content

Androgen deprivation therapy during and after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Androgen deprivation therapy during and after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a case control study
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4189-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myong Kim, Cheryn Song, In Gab Jeong, Seung-Kwon Choi, Myungchan Park, Myungsun Shim, Young Seok Kim, Dalsan You, Jun Hyuk Hong, Choung-Soo Kim, Hanjong Ahn

Abstract

Here we assessed the influence of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during and/or after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and radiographic progression in patients with prostate cancer. Patients with prostate cancer who underwent post-prostatectomy RT were analyzed. BCR and radiographic progression after RT were compared according to the concurrent or salvage ADT. Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for BCR and radiographic progression. Of the 227 patients who underwent post-prostatectomy RT, 95 (41.9%) received concurrent ADT for a median of 17.0 months. Despite more aggressive disease characteristics in the concurrent ADT group than in the RT-only group, the former had a better 5-year BCR-free survival rate than the latter (66.1 vs. 53.9%; p = 0.016), whereas the radiographic progression rate was not significantly different between two groups. On the other hand, salvage ADT after post-RT BCR significantly delayed radiographic progression (5-year radiographic progression-free survival; 75.2 vs. 44.5%; p = 0.002). Concurrent ADT improved BCR-free survival, and salvage ADT after post-RT BCR improved radiographic progression-free survival. To maximize the oncological benefit, ADT of sufficient duration should be implemented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,468,008
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,534
of 8,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,633
of 332,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#185
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.