↓ Skip to main content

Identification of the cellular components involved in de novo immune hepatitis: a quantitative immunohistochemical analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of the cellular components involved in de novo immune hepatitis: a quantitative immunohistochemical analysis
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12967-018-1440-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Aguado-Domínguez, Lourdes Gómez, José Manuel Sousa, Miguel Ángel Gómez-Bravo, Antonio Núñez-Roldán, Isabel Aguilera

Abstract

Diagnosis of de novo immune hepatitis (dnIH) after liver transplantation relies on biopsy findings, with an abundance of plasma cells (PCs) in the inflammatory infiltrates a hallmark of the disease. Very little is known about what other types of immune cells exist in the infiltrates mainly located in the portal areas of the liver tissue. We analyzed the composition of T cells, B cells, PCs, and macrophages in the liver biopsies of 12 patients with dnIH, 9 of them obtained at the time of diagnosis. For comparison, biopsies from 9 patients with chronic rejection (CR) were included in the study. The results were analyzed by a computer-assisted stereology quantification method. The major components of the infiltrates in the portal areas were CD3+T lymphocytes in both groups, with 36.6% in the dnIH group versus 49.4% in the CR group. CD20+B lymphocytes represented 14.9% in the dnIH group and 29.1% in the CR group. Macrophage levels were very similar in the dnIH and CR group (19.7% versus 16.8%, respectively). PCs were much less represented in CR biopsies than those from the dnIH group (mean value of 4.7% versus 28.8%). In conclusion, the determination of a characteristic cellular profile could be an important tool for a more reliable diagnosis of dnIH, in support of the histological evaluation made by the pathologist, which in most cases is challenging. Recognition of this condition is crucial because it leads to graft failure if left untreated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,378,457
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,802
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,749
of 333,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#41
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.