You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of calculated and experimental power in maximal lactate-steady state during cycling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-11-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Hauser, Jennifer Adam, Henry Schulz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 11% |
Belgium | 2 | 11% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Austria | 1 | 6% |
Czechia | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 6 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 21% |
Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 53 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,349,063
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#28
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,225
of 228,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.