↓ Skip to main content

Supervised physical exercise to improve the quality of life of cancer patients: the EFICANCER randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supervised physical exercise to improve the quality of life of cancer patients: the EFICANCER randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1055-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aintzane Sancho, Sergio Carrera, Marisol Arietaleanizbeascoa, Veronica Arce, Nere Mendizabal Gallastegui, Anna Giné March, Aitor Sanz-Guinea, Araceli Eskisabel, Ana Lopez Rodriguez, Rosa A Martín, Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco, Gonzalo Grandes

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal form of exercise for individuals with cancer has yet to be identified, but there is evidence that exercise improves their quality of life. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and efficiency of an innovative physical exercise programme, for individuals undergoing chemotherapy for breast, gastrointestinal or non-small cell lung tumours, for improving quality of life, reducing level of fatigue, and enhancing functional capacity over time.Design/MethodsWe will conduct a clinical trial in 66 patients with stage IV breast, gastrointestinal or non-small cell lung cancer, recruited by the Department of Oncology of the referral hospital from 4 primary care health centres of the Basque Health Service (Osakidetza). These patients will be randomised to one of two groups. The treatment common to both groups will be the usual care for cancer: optimized usual drug therapies and strengthening of self-care; in addition, patients in the intervention group will participate in a 2-month exercise programme, including both aerobic and strength exercises, supervised by nurses in their health centre. The principal outcome variable is health-related quality of life, measured blindly with the 30-item European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Short Form-36 four times: at baseline, and 2, 6 and 12 months later. The secondary outcome variables are fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire), functional capacity (6-Minute Walk Test and cardiorespiratory test), muscle strength (hand-held dynamometry and sit-to-stand test), radiological response to treatment (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) and progression-free and overall survival. Age, sex, diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and smoking status will be considered as predictive variables. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing changes at each time point between groups, adjusting for baseline values by analysis of covariance.DiscussionAs well as achieving the objectives set, this study will provide us with information on patient perception of the care received and an opportunity to develop a project based on collaborative action between the primary care and oncology professionals.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01786122 Registration date: 02/05/2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 71 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 20%
Sports and Recreations 29 10%
Psychology 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 88 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,914,771
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,717
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,623
of 352,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#36
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.