↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial of early insulin therapy in very low birth weight infants, "NIRTURE" (neonatal insulin replacement therapy in Europe)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled trial of early insulin therapy in very low birth weight infants, "NIRTURE" (neonatal insulin replacement therapy in Europe)
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-7-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Beardsall, Sophie Vanhaesebrouck, Amanda L Ogilvy-Stuart, Jag S Ahluwalia, Christine Vanhole, Christopher Palmer, Paula Midgley, Mike Thompson, Luc Cornette, Mirjam Weissenbruch, Marta Thio, Francis de Zegher, David Dunger

Abstract

Studies in adult intensive care have highlighted the importance of insulin and improved glucose control on survival, with 32% reduction in mortality, 22% reduction in intensive care stay and halving of the incidence of bacteraemia. Very low birth weight infants requiring intensive care also have relative insulin deficiency often leading to hyperglycaemia during the first week of life. The physiological influences on insulin secretion and sensitivity, and the potential importance of glucose control at this time are not well established. However there is increasing evidence that the early postnatal period is critical for pancreatic development. At this time a complex set of signals appears to influence pancreatic development and beta cell survival. This has implications both in terms of acute glucose control but also relative insulin deficiency is likely to play a role in poor postnatal growth, which has been associated with later motor and cognitive impairment, and fewer beta cells are linked to risk of type 2 diabetes later in life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Engineering 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,916,590
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,423
of 3,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,003
of 74,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.