You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pigs in sequence space: A 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-6-70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rasmus Wernersson, Mikkel H Schierup, Frank G Jørgensen, Jan Gorodkin, Frank Panitz, Hans-Henrik Stærfeldt, Ole F Christensen, Thomas Mailund, Henrik Hornshøj, Ami Klein, Jun Wang, Bin Liu, Songnian Hu, Wei Dong, Wei Li, Gane KS Wong, Jun Yu, Jian Wang, Christian Bendixen, Merete Fredholm, Søren Brunak, Huanming Yang, Lars Bolund |
| Abstract |
Comparative whole genome analysis of Mammalia can benefit from the addition of more species. The pig is an obvious choice due to its economic and medical importance as well as its evolutionary position in the artiodactyls. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,102,803
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,701
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,193
of 58,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.