↓ Skip to main content

The role of bacteria in cancer therapy – enemies in the past, but allies at present

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of bacteria in cancer therapy – enemies in the past, but allies at present
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13027-018-0180-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiyu Song, Miza S. Vuai, Mintao Zhong

Abstract

In recent decades, bacteria's therapeutic role has aroused attention in medicinal and pharmaceutical research. While bacteria are considered among the primary agents for causing cancer, recent research has shown intriguing results suggesting that bacteria can be effective agents for cancer treatment - they are the perfect vessels for targeted cancer therapy. Several bacterial strains/species have been discovered to possess inherent oncolytic potentials to invade and colonize solid tumors in vivo. The therapeutic strategy of using bacteria for treating cancer is considered to be effective; however, the severe side effects encountered during the treatment resulted in the abandonment of the therapy. State-of-the-art genetic engineering has been recently applied to bacteria therapy and resulted in a greater efficacy with minimum side effects. In addition, the anti-cancer potential of tumor-targeting bacteria through oral administration circumvents the use of the intravenous route and the associated adverse effects. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the latest literature on the role of bacteria in cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 84 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 95 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,082,130
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#99
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,395
of 339,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.