The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The significance of the diversity and composition of the cecal microbiota of the Tibetan swine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Microbiology, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13213-018-1329-z |
Authors |
Weiping Yang, Haiyun Xin, Fangjun Cao, Jinxing Hou, Li Ma, Lijuan Bao, Fangyuan Wang, Zhantao Yu, Binyun Cao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 50% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,810,623
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Microbiology
#38
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,960
of 332,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Microbiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them