↓ Skip to main content

SETIL: Italian multicentric epidemiological case–control study on risk factors for childhood leukaemia, non hodgkin lymphoma and neuroblastoma: study population and prevalence of risk factors in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SETIL: Italian multicentric epidemiological case–control study on risk factors for childhood leukaemia, non hodgkin lymphoma and neuroblastoma: study population and prevalence of risk factors in Italy
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13052-014-0103-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corrado Magnani, Stefano Mattioli, Lucia Miligi, Alessandra Ranucci, Roberto Rondelli, Alberto Salvan, Luigi Bisanti, Giuseppe Masera, Carmelo Rizzari, Paola Zambon, Santina Cannizzaro, Lorenzo Gafà, Lia Lidia Luzzatto, Alessandra Benvenuti, Paola Michelozzi, Ursula Kirchmayer, Pierluigi Cocco, Pierfranco Biddau, Claudia Galassi, Egidio Celentano, Erni Guarino, Giorgio Assennato, Gigliola de Nichilo, Domenico Franco Merlo, Vittorio Bocchini, Franco Pannelli, Paola Mosciatti, Liliana Minelli, Manuela Chiavarini, Marina Cuttini, Veronica Casotto, Maria Valeria Torregrossa, Rosalia Maria Valenti, Francesco Forastiere, Riccardo Haupt, Susanna Lagorio, Serena Risica, Alessandro Polichetti

Abstract

BackgroundAetiology of childhood leukaemia and childhood neoplasm is poorly understood. Information on the prevalence of risk factors in the childhood population is limited. SETIL is a population based case¿control study on childhood leukaemia, conducted with two companion studies on non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and neuroblastoma. The study relies on questionnaire interviews and 50 Hz magnetic field (ELF-MF) indoor measurements. This paper discusses the SETIL study design and includes descriptive information.MethodsThe study was carried out in 14 Italian regions (78.3% of Italian population aged 0¿10). It included leukaemia, NHL and neuroblastoma cases incident in 0¿10 year olds in 1998¿2001, registered by the Italian Association of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (AIEOP) (accrual over 95% of estimated incidence). Two controls for each leukaemia case were randomly sampled from the Local Health Authorities rolls, matched by gender, birthdate and residence. The same controls were used in NHL and neuroblastoma studies. Parents were interviewed at home on: physical agents (ELF-MF and ionizing radiation), chemicals (smoking, solvents, traffic, insecticides), occupation, medical and personal history of children and parents, infectious diseases, immunizations and associated factors. Occupational exposure was collected using job specific modules. ELF-MF was measured in the main rooms (spot measurement) and close to child¿s bed (48 hours measurement).ResultsThe study included: 683 leukaemia cases (87% ALL, 13% AnLL), 97 NHL, 155 neuroblastomas, and 1044 controls.ELF-MF long term measurements were obtained for 61.1% of controls and 81.6% of leukaemia cases; 8.8% of controls were exposed at over 0.1 microTesla (¿T), 3.5% and 2.1% at respectively over 0.2 and 0.3 ¿T. 25% of controls¿ fathers had smoked over 10 cigarettes/day during the year of conception, varying according to education and region. Maternal smoking was less common (71.4% did not smoke in pregnancy). Maternal passive smoking during pregnancy was reported by 31.2% of controls; the child¿s passive smoking for 28.6%.Occupational exposure to solvents was estimated in 18.3% of controls¿ fathers and 7.7% of mothers. Contact with public was more frequent among mothers (36.1%) than fathers (23.4%).ConclusionsSETIL represents a data source on exposure of Italian children to a broad array of potential carcinogenic factors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#860
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,067
of 359,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.