↓ Skip to main content

WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists
Published in
Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, December 2004
DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph H Abramson

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows) computer programs for epidemiologists are designed for use in practice and research in the health field and as learning or teaching aids. They aim to complement other statistics packages. The programs are free, and can be downloaded from the Internet. IMPLEMENTATION: There are at present four WINPEPI programs: DESCRIBE, for use in descriptive epidemiology, COMPARE2, for use in comparisons of two independent groups or samples, PAIRSetc, for use in comparisons of paired and other matched observations, and WHATIS, a "ready reckoner" utility program. The programs contain 75 modules, each of which provides a number, sometimes a large number, of statistical procedures. The manuals explain the uses, limitations and applicability of specific procedures, and furnish formulae and references. CONCLUSIONS: WINPEPI provides a wide variety of statistical routines commonly used by epidemiologists, and is a handy resource for many procedures that are not very commonly used or easily found. The programs are in general user-friendly, although some users may be confused by the large numbers of options and results provided. The main limitations are the inability to read data files and the fact that only one of the programs presents graphic results. WINPEPI has a considerable potential as a learning and teaching aid.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor 10 8%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#22
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,193
of 129,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them