↓ Skip to main content

The human fatty acid-binding protein family: Evolutionary divergences and functions

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
352 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The human fatty acid-binding protein family: Evolutionary divergences and functions
Published in
Human Genomics, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-5-3-170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca L Smathers, Dennis R Petersen

Abstract

Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are members of the intracellular lipid-binding protein (iLBP) family and are involved in reversibly binding intracellular hydrophobic ligands and trafficking them throughout cellular compartments, including the peroxisomes, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and nucleus. FABPs are small, structurally conserved cytosolic proteins consisting of a water-filled, interior-binding pocket surrounded by ten anti-parallel beta sheets, forming a beta barrel. At the superior surface, two alpha-helices cap the pocket and are thought to regulate binding. FABPs have broad specificity, including the ability to bind long-chain (C16-C20) fatty acids, eicosanoids, bile salts and peroxisome proliferators. FABPs demonstrate strong evolutionary conservation and are present in a spectrum of species including Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, mouse and human. The human genome consists of nine putatively functional protein-coding FABP genes. The most recently identified family member, FABP12, has been less studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 16%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Chemistry 19 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 61 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,135,210
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#84
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,936
of 120,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them