↓ Skip to main content

Cancer awareness among community pharmacist: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer awareness among community pharmacist: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4195-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kofi Boamah Mensah, Frasia Oosthuizen, Adwoa Bemah Bonsu

Abstract

The WHO recognises that community pharmacists are the most accessible healthcare professionals to the general public. Most patients regularly visit community pharmacies for health information and also seek advice from pharmacists with respect to signs and symptoms of cancer. As readily accessible health care professionals, community pharmacists are also in the best position to include cancer-screening initiatives into their practice. Pharmacists are therefore in a good position to raise awareness when they counsel people who buy over-the-counter medication for the control of possible cancer-related symptoms. The aim of this review was to critically appraise evidence gathered from studies that; (1) explore or assess knowledge of community pharmacist on signs and symptoms of cancer, (2) explore or assess knowledge of community pharmacist on cancer screening. EMBASE (ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) were systematically searched for studies conducted between 2005 to July 2017. Studies that focused on knowledge of community pharmacist in cancer screening, signs and symptoms were included. A total of 1538 articles were identified from the search, of which 4 out of the 28 potentially relevant abstracts were included in the review. Findings of the selected studies revealed lack of sufficient knowledge on breast cancer screening, signs and symptoms. Both studies attributed knowledge limitation as the cause of reason for the key findings of their studies. The selected studies focused largely on breast cancer, which hinder the generalizability and transferability of the findings. Hence there is a need for more studies to be conducted in this area to draw a better conclusion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 35%