↓ Skip to main content

Diaphragm dysfunction during weaning from mechanical ventilation: an underestimated phenomenon with clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
155 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaphragm dysfunction during weaning from mechanical ventilation: an underestimated phenomenon with clinical implications
Published in
Critical Care, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-1992-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Dres, Alexandre Demoule

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2018. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2018 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 23 10%
Other 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 59 25%
Unknown 61 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 75 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#465,232
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#276
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,758
of 348,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.