↓ Skip to main content

Gaps between calcium recommendations to prevent pre-eclampsia and current intakes in one hospital in Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaps between calcium recommendations to prevent pre-eclampsia and current intakes in one hospital in Argentina
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela Cormick, Nanci N Zhang, Simon P Andrade, María J Quiroga, Ingrid Di Marco, Andrés Porta, Fernando Althabe, José M Belizán

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders are a major cause of maternal mortality. In Latin America and the Caribbean, pre-eclampsia accounts for approximately one in every four maternal deaths. The World Health Organization recommends calcium supplementation during pregnancy for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in locations where dietary calcium intake is low. Calcium intake in Argentina is reported to be below WHO recommended levels; however, calcium intake from supplements and water has not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate calcium intake from supplements and water in a group of pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,137
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,273
of 360,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#44
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.