↓ Skip to main content

Socio-demographic characteristics influencing cervical cancer screening intention of HIV-positive women in the central region of Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socio-demographic characteristics influencing cervical cancer screening intention of HIV-positive women in the central region of Ghana
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40661-018-0060-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Innocentia Ebu

Abstract

The burden of HIV and cervical cancer is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa. Women with HIV are more likely to have persistent HPV infection leading to cervical abnormalities and cancer. Cervical cancer screening seems to be the single most critical intervention in any efforts to prevent cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the socio-demographic factors influencing intention to seek cervical cancer screening by HIV-positive women in the Central Region of Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study involving a convenience sample of 660 HIV-positive women aged 20 to 65 years receiving antiretroviral therapy in HIV care centres in the Central Region of Ghana was conducted using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The data were summarised and analysed using frequencies, percentages and binary logistic regression. The study revealed that 82.0% of HIV-positive women intended to obtain cervical cancer screening. Level of education was a determinant of cervical cancer screening intention. HIV-positive women with low levels of education were 2.67 times (95% CI, 1.61-4.42) more likely to have intention to screen than those with no formal education. Those with high levels of education were 3.16 times (95% CI, 1.42-7.02) more likely to have intention to screen than those with no formal education. However, age, religion, marital status, employment status, and ability to afford the cost of cervical cancer screening were not determinants of intention to screen. Education of women of all ages needs to be a priority, as it could enable them to adopt appropriate health behaviours and engage in cervical cancer screening. Additionally, interventions to improve understanding of cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive women are highly recommended. These include health education about the disease and availability of screening options in HIV/AIDS care centres.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 62 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 17%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 67 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,379,536
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice
#23
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,008
of 332,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them