↓ Skip to main content

Aplastic anemia secondary to nivolumab and ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Hematology & Oncology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aplastic anemia secondary to nivolumab and ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma: a case report
Published in
Experimental Hematology & Oncology, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40164-018-0098-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. E. Meyers, W. F. Hill, A. Suo, V. Jimenez-Zepeda, T. Cheng, N. A. Nixon

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is becoming an increasingly prevalent strategy in the clinical realm of cancer therapeutics. With more patients being administered ICB for a host of tumor types, the scope of adverse events associated with these drugs will likely grow. Here we report a case of aplastic anemia (AA) in a patient with metastatic melanoma secondary to dual ICB therapy. To our knowledge, this is only the second case of AA secondary to dual ICB in the literature, and the first to have a positive patient outcome. A 51-year old male with metastatic melanoma was started on dual immune checkpoint blockade, in the form ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg). Two weeks following the second cycle, he presented to the emergency department with profound polypipsia, polyuria and fatigue. The patient was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis secondary to immune therapy induced type-1 diabetes and was admitted to the ICU. While in hospital the patient developed a symptomatic anemia and neutropenia. A bone marrow biopsy revealed a markedly hypocellular marrow with trinlineage hypoplasia with no evidence of myelodysplasia, neoplasm or excess blasts. Flow cytometry revealed an inverted CD4+:CD8+ratio and an absence of hematogones. Taken together the presumed etiology was AA secondary to immunotherapy. The patient was subsequently started in IV methylprednisone 70 mg/day for 8 days, followed by a prednisone taper. This intervention rectified the bicytopenia and to date the patient has shown stable blood counts. With the use of ICBs becoming increasingly prevalent in the clinical arena, the number of patients presenting with immune-related adverse events will likely increase. The current case illustrates the need to be vigilant when managing cancer patients receiving ICB. The resolution of this patient's AA with corticosteroids highlights the value of early detection and appropriate treatment of these rare immune-mediated adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,298,122
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Hematology & Oncology
#15
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,905
of 333,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Hematology & Oncology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them