↓ Skip to main content

Maternal participant experience in a South African birth cohort study enrolling healthy pregnant women and their infants

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal participant experience in a South African birth cohort study enrolling healthy pregnant women and their infants
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13010-016-0036-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Whitney Barnett, Kirsty Brittain, Katherine Sorsdahl, Heather J. Zar, Dan J. Stein

Abstract

Critical to conducting high quality research is the ability to attract and retain participants, especially for longitudinal studies. Understanding participant experiences and motivators or barriers to participating in clinical research is crucial. There are limited data on healthy participant experiences in longitudinal research, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to investigate quantitatively participant experiences in a South African birth cohort study. Maternal participant experience was evaluated by a self-administered survey in the Drakenstein Child Health Study, a longitudinal birth cohort study investigating the early life determinants of child health. Pregnant mothers, enrolled during the second trimester, were followed through childbirth and the early childhood years. Satisfaction scores were derived from the participant experience survey and quantitatively analyzed; associations between satisfaction scores and sociodemographic variables were then investigated using a linear regression model. Data were included from 585 pregnant mothers (median age 26.6 years), who had participated in the study for a median time of 16 months. Overall participant satisfaction was high (median score 51/60) and associated with increased attendance of study visits. Reasons for participating were a belief that involvement would improve their health, their child's health or the health of family and friends. Potential reasons for leaving the study were inconvenience, not receiving clinical or study results, and unexpected changes in study visits or procedures. Variables associated with higher overall satisfaction scores were no prior participation in research, higher socioeconomic status, less intensive follow-up schedules and having experienced stressful life events in the past year. Satisfaction scores were high and associated with increased visit attendance. Participants' perceived benefits of study participation, most notably the potential for an improvement in the health of their child, were a significant motivator to enroll and remain in the study. The consistent theme of perceived health benefits as a motivator to join and remain in the study raises the question of whether participation in research results in actual improvements in health.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 38 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Psychology 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 40 37%