↓ Skip to main content

Paraganglioma in the bladder: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paraganglioma in the bladder: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1473-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genta Iwamoto, Takashi Kawahara, Mikiko Tanabe, Sahoko Ninomiya, Daiji Takamoto, Taku Mochizuki, Shinnosuke Kuroda, Teppei Takeshima, Koji Izumi, Yusuke Hattori, Jun-ichi Teranishi, Yasushi Yumura, Yasuhide Miyoshi, Hiroji Uemura

Abstract

Paraganglioma is an extra site of pheochromocytoma. Paraganglioma in the bladder is a very rare disease accounting for 0.06% of all bladder tumors. A 77-year-old Japanese man was referred to our department for the further examination of a bladder tumor detected on preoperative computed tomography of his gastric cancer. Cystoscopy revealed a submucosal tumor in the upper area of his bladder, so transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed. During transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, his blood pressure sharply increased, and a pathological examination showed paraganglioma in his bladder. Postoperative I-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy detected a higher intake of his bladder tumor. Laboratory examinations showed a slightly increased noradrenaline level of 530 pg/ml and reduced platelet count at 167,000/μL. Based on the progression of his gastric cancer, no additional therapy was performed on his bladder tumor. Eight months after surgery, he died from aspiration pneumonitis. Here we report a rare case of paraganglioma in the bladder. We discuss paraganglioma based on previous studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,594,219
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,280
of 3,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,972
of 328,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#40
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,948 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.