You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13049-018-0489-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Singer, Joshua C. Reynolds, David J. Lockey, Ben O’Brien |
| Abstract |
Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has remained low despite advances in resuscitation science. Hospital-based extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a novel use of an established technology that provides greater blood flow and oxygen delivery during cardiac arrest than closed chest compressions. Hospital-based ECPR is currently offered to selected OHCA patients in specialized centres. The interval between collapse and restoration of circulation is inversely associated with good clinical outcomes after ECPR. Pre-hospital delivery of ECPR concurrent with conventional resuscitation is one approach to shortening this interval and improving outcomes after OHCA. This article examines the background and rationale for pre-hospital ECPR; summarises the findings of a literature search for published evidence; and considers candidate selection, logistics, and complications for this complex intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 18% |
| Spain | 9 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Norway | 3 | 5% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 28% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,203,613
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#86
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,199
of 345,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.