↓ Skip to main content

Gut microbiome modulates efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut microbiome modulates efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13045-018-0592-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Yi, Shengnan Yu, Shuang Qin, Qian Liu, Hanxiao Xu, Weiheng Zhao, Qian Chu, Kongming Wu

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is a novel strategy for cancer treatments in recent years. However, it was observed that most patients treated with ICIs could not get benefit from the therapy, which led to the limitation of clinical application. Motivated by potent and durable efficacy of ICIs, oncologists endeavor to explore the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and increase the drug sensitivity. It is known that heterogeneity of gut microbiome in populations may result in different outcomes of therapy. In xenograft model, bacteria in gut have been proved as a crucial factor regulating immunotherapy efficacy. And the similar phenomenon was obtained in patients. In this review, we summarized relevant advancements about gut microbiome and ICIs. Furthermore, we focused on modulatory function of gut microbiome in ICIs therapy and possible antitumor mechanism of specific commensals in ICIs treatment. We propose that gut microbiome is an important predictive factor, and manipulation of gut microbiome is feasible to elevate response rate in ICIs therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 9 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 52 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,111,370
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#168
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,891
of 333,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.