↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and study protocol for the supporting children’s outcomes using rewards, exercise and skills (SCORES) group randomized controlled trial: A physical activity and fundamental movement skills…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
406 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and study protocol for the supporting children’s outcomes using rewards, exercise and skills (SCORES) group randomized controlled trial: A physical activity and fundamental movement skills intervention for primary schools in low-income communities
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-427
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Lubans, Philip J Morgan, Kristen Weaver, Robin Callister, Deborah L Dewar, Sarah A Costigan, Tara L Finn, Jordan Smith, Lee Upton, Ronald C Plotnikoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 400 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 16%
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Researcher 47 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 93 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 89 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 11%
Psychology 39 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Social Sciences 36 9%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 117 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,972
of 14,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,707
of 167,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#116
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.