↓ Skip to main content

Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0104-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilse EM van Grevenhof, Julius HJ van der Werf

Abstract

In crossbreeding programs, genomic selection offers the opportunity to make efficient use of information on crossbred (CB) individuals in the selection of purebred (PB) candidates. In such programs, reference populations often contain genotyped PB animals, although the breeding objective is usually more focused on CB performance. The question is what would be the benefit of including a larger proportion of CB individuals in the reference population. In a deterministic simulation study, we evaluated the benefit of including various proportions of CB animals in a reference population for genomic selection of PB animals in a crossbreeding program. We used a pig breeding scheme with selection for a moderately heritable trait and a size of 6000 for the reference population. Applying genomic selection to improve the performance of CB individuals, with a genetic correlation between PB and CB performance (rPC) of 0.7, selection accuracy of PB candidates increased from 0.49 to 0.52 if the reference population consisted of PB individuals, it increased to 0.55 if the reference population consisted of the same number of CB individuals, and to 0.60 if the size of the CB reference population was twice that of the reference population for each PB line. The advantage of using CB rather than PB individuals increased linearly with the proportion of CB individuals in the reference population. This advantage disappeared quickly if rPC was higher or if the breeding objective put some emphasis on PB performance. The benefit of adding CB individuals to an existing PB reference population was limited for high rPC. Using CB rather than PB individuals in a reference population for genomic selection can provide substantial advantages, but only when correlations between PB and CB performances are not high and PB performance is not part of the breeding objective.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Master 11 16%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 67%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%