↓ Skip to main content

Ambiguous allele combinations in HLA Class I and Class II sequence-based typing: when precise nucleotide sequencing leads to imprecise allele identification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ambiguous allele combinations in HLA Class I and Class II sequence-based typing: when precise nucleotide sequencing leads to imprecise allele identification
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2004
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-2-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon D Adams, Kathleen C Barracchini, Deborah Chen, FuMeei Robbins, Lu Wang, Paula Larsen, Robert Luhm, David F Stroncek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Other 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#974
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,990
of 72,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them