↓ Skip to main content

Outdoor-sleeping and other night-time activities in northern Ghana: implications for residual transmission and malaria prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outdoor-sleeping and other night-time activities in northern Ghana: implications for residual transmission and malaria prevention
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0543-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

April Monroe, Obed Asamoah, Yukyan Lam, Hannah Koenker, Paul Psychas, Matthew Lynch, Emily Ricotta, Sureyya Hornston, Amanda Berman, Steven A Harvey

Abstract

BackgroundDespite targeted indoor residual spraying (IRS) over a six-year period and free mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), malaria rates in northern Ghana remain high. Outdoor sleeping and other night-time social, cultural and economic activities that increase exposure to infective mosquito bites are possible contributors. This study was designed to document these phenomena through direct observation, and to explore the context in which they occur.MethodsDuring the late dry season months of February and March 2014, study team members carried out continuous household observations from dusk to dawn in one village in Ghana¿s Northern Region and one in Upper West Region. In-depth interviews with health workers and community residents helped supplement observational findings.ResultsStudy team members completed observations of 182 individuals across 24 households, 12 households per site. Between the two sites, they interviewed 14 health workers, six community health volunteers and 28 community residents. In early evening, nearly all study participants were observed to be outdoors and active. From 18.00-23.00 hours, socializing, night school, household chores, and small-scale economic activities were common. All-night funerals, held outdoors and attended by large numbers of community members, were commonly reported and observed. Outdoor sleeping was frequently documented at both study sites, with 42% of the study population sleeping outdoors at some time during the night. While interviewees mentioned bed net use as important to malaria prevention, observed use was low for both indoor and outdoor sleeping. Net access within households was 65%, but only 17% of those with access used a net at any time during the night. Participants cited heat as the primary barrier and reported higher net use during the rainy season.DiscussionOutdoor sleeping and other night-time activities were extensive, and could significantly increase malaria risk. These findings suggest that indoor-oriented control measures such as ITNs and IRS are insufficient to eliminate malaria in this setting, especially given the low net use observed. Development and evaluation of complementary outdoor control strategies should be prioritized. A research agenda is proposed to quantify the relative risk of outdoor night-time activities and test potential vector control interventions that might reduce that risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 16%
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 75 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 18%
Social Sciences 40 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 84 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,982,102
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,173
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,365
of 362,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#18
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.