You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasma Protein Biomarkers Correlated with the Development of Diet-Induced Type 2 Diabetes in Mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12014-009-9040-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shigeru Okada, Edward O. List, Sudha Sankaran, John J. Kopchick |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#92
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,279
of 166,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them