↓ Skip to main content

Safety of a new extensively hydrolysed formula in children with cow's milk protein allergy: a double blind crossover study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of a new extensively hydrolysed formula in children with cow's milk protein allergy: a double blind crossover study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, October 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne WJ Terheggen-Lagro, Ilse MSL Khouw, Anne Schaafsma, Erik AK Wauters

Abstract

Formulae for infants with cow's milk protein allergy (CMA) should be based on extensively hydrolysed protein. 'Extensively' however is not strictly defined. Differences in molecular weight and peptide chain length may affect its clinical outcome. We studied the safety of a new extensively hydrolysed casein based formula (Frisolac Allergycare: FAC) for children with IgE mediated CMA. Thirty children, aged 1.5 - 14.8 years old (median 4.9 years) with persistent CMA were enrolled in this double-blind reference product (Nutramigen: NUT) controlled crossover study. All had positive skin prick tests (SPT) and IgE mediated allergy, showing immediate reactions after ingestion of small amounts of milk. Twenty-five children also had positive radio allergen sorbent tests (RAST) to cow's milk. Formulae provided consisted of 80% elementary formula in combination with 20% reference or test product. Crossover periods lasted for two weeks. From both products molecular weight (MALDI-TOF method and HPLC) and peptide chain length distribution (adapted Edman degradation) were determined. Maximum molecular weights of NUT and FAC are 2.1 and 2.56 kDa, respectively. The contribution of free amino acids and small peptides <0.5 kDa is 46% for FAC and 53% for NUT. About 50% of the protein fraction of both products consists of peptides longer than four amino acids. Three children did not complete the study. The other children all tolerated FAC very well; no adverse reactions were reported. The new extensively hydrolysed casein-based formula (FAC) can safely be used in children with IgE mediated cow's milk allergy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 31%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,401
of 3,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,054
of 47,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them