↓ Skip to main content

Sporadic ALS is not associated with VAPB gene mutations in Southern Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 112)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sporadic ALS is not associated with VAPB gene mutations in Southern Italy
Published in
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, May 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-5751-5-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Luisa Conforti, Teresa Sprovieri, Rosalucia Mazzei, Carmine Ungaro, Alessandro Tessitore, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Alessandra Patitucci, Angela Magariello, AnnaLia Gabriele, Vincenzo Labella, Isabella Laura Simone, Giovanni Majorana, Maria Rosaria Monsurrò, Paola Valentino, Maria Muglia, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract

Mutations in the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Sod1) gene have been reported to cause adult-onset autosomal dominant Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (FALS). In sporadic cases (SALS) de novo mutations in the Sod1 gene have occasionally been observed. The recent finding of a mutation in the VAMP/synaptobrevin-associated membrane protein B (VAPB) gene as the cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS8), prompted us to investigate the entire coding region of this gene in SALS patients. One hundred twenty-five unrelated patients with adult-onset ALS and 150 healthy sex-age-matched subjects with the same genetic background were analyzed. Genetic analysis for all exons of the VAPB gene by DHPLC revealed 5 variant profiles in 83 out of 125 SALS patients. Direct sequencing of these PCR products revealed 3 nucleotide substitutions. Two of these were found within intron 3 of the gene, harbouring 4 variant DHPLC profiles. The third nucleotide variation (Asp130Glu) was the only substitution present in the coding region of the VAPB gene, and it occurred within exon 4. It was found in three patients out of 125. The frequency of the detected exon variation in the VAPB gene was not significantly different between patients and controls. In conclusion, our study suggests that VAPB mutations are not a common cause of adult-onset SALS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Neuroscience 6 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#41
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,543
of 64,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them