You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of automated brightfield double In Situ hybridization (BDISH) application for HER2 g ene and chromosome 17 centromere (CEN 17) for breast carcinomas and an assay performance comparison to manual dual color HER2 fluorescence In Situ hybridization (FISH)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-3-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroaki Nitta, Beatrice Hauss-Wegrzyniak, Megan Lehrkamp, Adrian E Murillo, Fabien Gaire, Michael Farrell, Eric Walk, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Masafumi Kurosumi, Manfred Dietel, Lin Wang, Margaret Loftus, James Pettay, Raymond R Tubbs, Thomas M Grogan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#121
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,191
of 103,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them