↓ Skip to main content

Wax ester profiling of seed oil by nano-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wax ester profiling of seed oil by nano-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry
Published in
Plant Methods, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Iven, Cornelia Herrfurth, Ellen Hornung, Mareike Heilmann, Per Hofvander, Sten Stymne, Li-Hua Zhu, Ivo Feussner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 34%
Chemistry 15 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Engineering 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#509
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,556
of 195,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.