↓ Skip to main content

Effect of oral decontamination with chlorhexidine on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of oral decontamination with chlorhexidine on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis.
Published in
Critical Care, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/cc4837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilibeth A Pineda, Ranime G Saliba, Ali A El Solh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 117 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Other 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Professor 10 8%
Other 36 30%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 23 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,986
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,531
of 70,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.