↓ Skip to main content

Anogenital distance is related to ovarian follicular number in young Spanish women: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anogenital distance is related to ovarian follicular number in young Spanish women: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-11-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Mendiola, Manuela Roca, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Maria-Pilar Mira-Escolano, José J López-Espín, Emily S Barrett, Shanna H Swan, Alberto M Torres-Cantero

Abstract

In animals, anogenital distance (AGD) at birth reflects androgen levels during pregnancy and predicts adult AGD. Little is known about AGD in relation to female reproductive characteristics in humans, a question this study was designed to explore.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#821
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,570
of 278,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.