↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Markers in Patients with Chronic Wounds to Guide Surgical Debridement

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
304 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Markers in Patients with Chronic Wounds to Guide Surgical Debridement
Published in
Molecular Medicine, January 2007
DOI 10.2119/2006-00054.brem
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harold Brem, Olivera Stojadinovic, Robert F. Diegelmann, Hyacinth Entero, Brian Lee, Irena Pastar, Michael Golinko, Harvey Rosenberg, Marjana Tomic-Canic

Abstract

Chronic wounds, such as venous ulcers, are characterized by physiological impairments manifested by delays in healing, resulting in severe morbidity. Surgical debridement is routinely performed on chronic wounds because it stimulates healing. However, procedures are repeated many times on the same patient because, in contrast to tumor excision, there are no objective biological/molecular markers to guide the extent of debridement. To develop bioassays that can potentially guide surgical debridement, we assessed the pathogenesis of the patients' wound tissue before and after wound debridement. We obtained biopsies from three patients at two locations, the nonhealing edge (prior to debridement) and the adjacent, nonulcerated skin of the venous ulcers (post debridement), and evaluated their histology, biological response to wounding (migration) and gene expression profile. We found that biopsies from the nonhealing edges exhibit distinct pathogenic morphology (hyperproliferative/hyperkeratotic epidermis; dermal fibrosis; increased procollagen synthesis). Fibroblasts deriving from this location exhibit impaired migration in comparison to the cells from adjacent nonulcerated biopsies, which exhibit normalization of morphology and normal migration capacity. The nonhealing edges have a specific, identifiable, and reproducible gene expression profile. The adjacent nonulcerated biopsies have their own distinctive reproducible gene expression profile, signifying that particular wound areas can be identified by gene expression profiling. We conclude that chronic ulcers contain distinct subpopulations of cells with different capacity to heal and that gene expression profiling can be utilized to identify them. In the future, molecular markers will be developed to identify the nonimpaired tissue, thereby making surgical debridement more accurate and more efficacious.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 340 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 19%
Researcher 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 68 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 13%
Engineering 27 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 82 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,156,130
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#58
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,153
of 162,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.